THE FRAGILITY OF “SPIRITUAL RENEWAL” IN AMERICA: A RESEARCH-INFORMED PASTORAL ANALYSIS (2023–2025)
- Brent Madaris
- 36 minutes ago
- 5 min read

In recent months, we have been witnessing a growing number of articles, podcasts, and conference conversations suggesting that the United States may be experiencing a form of spiritual renewal. Reports of increased openness to faith, modest stabilization in religious affiliation, and renewed interest among some younger adults have fueled cautious optimism (sometimes fanatical optimism) across parts of the spiritual landscape.
At the same time, other respected studies continue to document long-term decline in church attendance, religious practice, and institutional trust. These seemingly contradictory signals have left many pastors uncertain how to interpret what they are seeing—both nationally and within their own congregations.
This article seeks to provide clarity rather than hype or despair on the idea of spiritual renewal in America. Drawing from multiple nationally respected research organizations between 2023 and 2025, it offers a balanced assessment of recent religious trends in America. The goal is not to predict revival or forecast decline, but to help pastors interpret the moment wisely, soberly, and faithfully. This understanding is important in helping to stabilize our thinking and refine our pastoral engagement.
THE DANGER OF SINGLE-STUDY INTERPRETATION
One of the most common errors in ministry interpretation is drawing broad conclusions from a single study or headline. One study is cited and it is presented as the end of the matter. This is not generally the way research works. Research organizations differ in methodology, sampling, question framing, and interpretive emphasis. Responsible pastoral leadership requires triangulation—placing multiple datasets side by side and asking what they individually, and collectively, reveal.
Recent analysis from Barna Group rightly notes that Christianity’s cultural influence continues to shrink, even when indicators of openness or curiosity appear to rise.¹ When read alongside other major research efforts, this conclusion reflects a broader reality: the American religious landscape is not reviving in a uniform or sustained way. It is unstable, uneven, and highly localized.
KEY NATIONAL FINDINGS (2023–2025)
Pew Research Center’s Religious Landscape Study remains the most comprehensive measure of religious identification in the United States. Since 2007, Pew has documented a substantial decline in Christian affiliation. Data collected in 2023–2024 suggest that this decline may be slowing or leveling, particularly among certain demographic cohorts.²
This leveling, however, should not be mistaken for resurgence. Pew researchers themselves caution that stabilization does not reverse the long-term trajectory; it simply indicates that the rapid losses of the previous decade may be giving way to a more complex phase of religious change.
Pastoral implication: Pew provides the baseline against which all other national studies should be read. Slowed decline is meaningful, but it does not constitute renewal.
The Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) reports that approximately 65–66 percent of Americans identified as Christian in 2023–2024.³ At the same time, PRRI emphasizes high levels of religious “churn”—frequent disaffiliation, switching between traditions, and redefinition of belief. Their work highlights the influence of political polarization, institutional distrust, and generational transition on religious identity.
PRRI’s data suggest that many Americans are not abandoning spirituality altogether but are disengaging from formal religious institutions. This trend is especially pronounced among younger adults.
Pastoral implication: Disaffiliation often reflects relational and institutional breakdown rather than outright theological rejection. Trust, credibility, and patient shepherding matter deeply in this climate.
Gallup’s long-running polling on religion and church attendance offers one of the clearest indicators of fragility. While religious identification has declined, church attendance has fallen more sharply and more consistently.⁴ In other words, practice is eroding faster than belief.
This distinction is critical. A population that retains religious language but lacks formative practices is spiritually vulnerable and easily displaced.
Pastoral implication: Identity without embodied practice is thin. Churches must rebuild rhythms of worship, prayer, and community rather than assuming attendance will recover organically.
Lifeway Research’s State of Theology studies provide insight into the beliefs of church attenders themselves. Recent surveys indicate that many core Christian doctrines remain affirmed among regular attenders. However, significant gaps persist in biblical literacy, theological coherence, and confidence in evangelism.⁵
Belief remains present, but formation is uneven. Attendance alone does not guarantee depth.
Pastoral implication: The primary challenge for many churches is not external hostility but internal thinness. Discipleship must be intentional rather than assumed.
Supplemental Pew surveys conducted between 2024 and 2025 offer further nuance. Some age cohorts show signs of stabilization on select religious measures, challenging narratives of uninterrupted decline.⁶ These findings temper despair but stop well short of indicating widespread renewal.
Pastoral implication: These data encourage realism without resignation—hope grounded in clarity, not illusion.
SUMMARY OF KEY NATIONAL STUDIES (2023–2025)
Study | Year(s) & Method | Key Findings | Pastoral Implication | Source |
Pew Research Center — Religious Landscape Study | 2023–2024, large nationally representative survey (~35,000 respondents) | Long-term decline in Christian identification since 2007; recent data suggests decline is slowing/leveling | Use as national benchmark; slowed decline ≠ renewal | Pew Research Center |
PRRI — Religious Change in America | 2023–2024, multi-wave national surveys & Census snapshots | ~65–66% identify as Christian; high levels of religious “churn” | Highlights need for local context, retention strategies, relational discipleship | PRRI |
Gallup — Religion & Attendance Tracking | 2023–2024, longitudinal polling | Steady decline in church attendance across generations; practice falls faster than identity | Rebuild habits and practices, not rely on affiliation alone | Gallup |
Lifeway Research — State of Theology | 2024–2025, surveys of church attenders/members | Core doctrinal beliefs remain, but formation gaps and weak evangelistic confidence persist | Reinforces need for intentional doctrinal teaching and discipleship | Lifeway Research |
Pew Research Center — Supplemental NPORS & Analyses | 2024–2025, large national opinion surveys | Some stabilization among cohorts on select religious measures; decline persists overall | Encourages realism: hope without illusion | Pew Research Center |
WHAT THE DATA COLLECTIVELY REVEAL
When read together, these studies point to a sobering but clarifying conclusion.
The United States is not experiencing a sweeping spiritual revival, nor is it undergoing sudden religious collapse. Instead, the church finds itself in a prolonged season of fragility.
Religious identity is weaker. Practice is thinner. Discipleship is uneven. Trust in institutions is low. Yet spiritual curiosity has not vanished, and openness persists in unexpected places.
This moment calls for neither triumphalism nor despair.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PASTORS AND CHURCH LEADERS
First, pastors must resist the temptation to overinterpret national headlines. Local churches do not minister to averages; they minister to people. National data provide context, not marching orders.
Second, formation must take precedence over attraction. This is very important! Programs may generate short-term interest, but only patient discipleship cultivates endurance and spiritual maturity.
Third, hope must be rooted in faithfulness rather than momentum. The church’s calling has never depended on cultural dominance, favorable trends, or institutional strength.
Finally, pastors should receive this season as an invitation—to rebuild depth, recover spiritual habits, and shepherd patiently in an unsettled age.
CONCLUSION
The data do not promise revival. Neither do they justify resignation.
They call the church back to its ordinary, God-appointed work:
preaching the Word,
making disciples,
loving people, and
trusting the Lord of the church with the outcome.
In times like these, the church does not need bigger, better headlines.
It needs deeper roots.
_________________________
FOOTNOTES
Barna Group, “Faith’s Shrinking Influence,” 2024.
Pew Research Center, Religious Landscape Study, 2023–2024.
Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI), Religious Change in America, 2023–2024.
Gallup, “Religion and Church Attendance Trends,” 2023–2024.
Lifeway Research, State of Theology, 2024–2025.
Pew Research Center, National Public Opinion Reference Survey (NPORS), 2024–2025.
REFERENCES
Barna Group. Faith’s Shrinking Influence. 2024.
Gallup. Religion and Church Attendance Trends. 2023–2024.
Lifeway Research. State of Theology. 2024–2025.
Pew Research Center. Religious Landscape Study. 2023–2024.
Pew Research Center. National Public Opinion Reference Survey (NPORS). 2024–2025.
Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI). Religious Change in America. 2023–2024.

